The Internet holds the power to profoundly change the way healthcare is delivered. Millions of patients, caregivers and physicians turn to the Internet every day to look up the latest information on important health topics and find support from like-minded people.
11 Responses to Pharma twittersphere - who is following you - Part I
PhilFeed › Fresh From My Twitter today
janvier 20th, 2010 at 16 h 07 min
[...] @DaphneLeigh: Nice analysis of pharma’s twitter activity from @whydotpharma: http://bit.ly/90RmvO #hcsmeu #hcsm #hcmktg #SocPharm RT @roskadigital: REMINDER: 2night at 8 pm EST is the #SocPharm [...]
Andrew Spong
janvier 20th, 2010 at 16 h 09 min
It’s great to see an update of these measures, Silja. Thank you! I am looking forward to Part II already
Some observations:
It is great to see that Johnny-come-lately account pfizer_news has leapt out of the wings and trounced the early adopters.
How did they do it?
Certainly, they began with a tidy all-media offensive to get things off the ground. Above all other things, however, I’d say their ace in the hole was putting a face to a name by adding Jen Kokell’s picture to their twitback. That, and buying followers (joke :)). I’d be really interested to see if the pace at which pfizer_news attracted users picked up after they took this decision. To my mind, it was a canny one.
It helps that the mix of interaction, content and corporate news they peddle is generally acceptable, and that they hit their straps quickly. They turned up with some sort of plan (so many others haven’t), and weren’t afraid to adapt. I don’t sense the frosty chill of lawyer scrutiny crackling over their tweets. Maybe Pfizer lawyers do ‘good cop, bad cop’ and bring coffee and bagels for Ray and Jen whilst they grill them as a little light relief from settling $2.3bn lawsuits.
I don’t think this is Pfizer’s ‘magic sauce’ so much as their being less squeamish about participation than some other corporate accounts still appear to be.
The performance of the rest of the bunch shows: 1) a three-tier division is emerging (two shown, one not registering); 2) even some of the most successful accounts still have an irrational fear (ie the tightest handcuffs) when it comes to following back; 3) the reticent could now be enjoying the benefits the top accounts are receiving if they’d been bold enough to embark upon the journey in the first place, and 4) (conversely) it’s never too late to make a new beginning (hat tip to pfizer_news)
Finally, 5) this is further evidence that social media is *not* ‘quick’ and ‘easy’, but that it is something you have to plug away at. Community building and awareness/engagement generation require time, attention, a human face, and an even temperament that can handle cage-rattling troublemakers like (ahem) us
Rohit
janvier 20th, 2010 at 21 h 16 min
Excellent idea for a post and interesting analysis. I particularly love the point about how social media can be used to humanize brands in this space. If ever there was a category where this was important, it’s pharma. Good to see that more brands seem to be moving into this space, and more importantly that folks are watching and taking notice.
Arthur Alston
janvier 22nd, 2010 at 11 h 53 min
Hello Silja
Glad to see that you’ve updated the analysis. Thank you for the trouble and for giving us all something interesting to read.
To be honest, I am not quite sure what exactly this quantitative analysis tells us - Pfizer leads the pack, but the “so-what” is missing and I hope that part II of the analysis will give us some qualitative insight.
Then on another note, the nominal numbers involved in following pharma on Twitter is really, really low isn’t it - compared to other industries and personalities. It would be interesting thought exercise to think about the reason for this: is it the fault of pharma, their past or current behaviour, or is it the fault of the general population, i.e. apathy or just not enough interest.
Regardless, thank you again for your analysis.
los followers de las farmacéuticas en twitter crecen un 51% en 6 meses
janvier 24th, 2010 at 23 h 46 min
[...] nuevo post de WhyDot pharma nos pone al día sobre la actividad de las compañías farmacéuticas en la twittersfera. Además [...]
Los seguidores de las farmacéuticas en Twitter crecen un 51% en 6 meses | Bureau de Salud
janvier 27th, 2010 at 16 h 05 min
[...] nuevo post de WhyDot pharma nos pone al día sobre la actividad de las compañías farmacéuticas en la twittersfera. Además [...]
Pharma twittersphere - who is following you- Part II - whydot pharma
janvier 29th, 2010 at 15 h 34 min
[...] This is Part II of the analysis on pharma’s twitter presence. If you remember, we saw in part I that some pharma companies seem to be more engaged than others on [...]
Who Follows Big Pharma On Twitter? - Better Health
février 2nd, 2010 at 15 h 00 min
[...] Spong (@AndrewSpong) each provided great insight into Pharma and Twitter. You can read their posts here and here, [...]
Pharma eMarketing Roundup 020510 « Impactiviti blog
février 5th, 2010 at 15 h 45 min
[...] data from Silja Chouquet on Pharma Twittersphere – who’s following you? (Part 1 and Part 2). WhyDot Pharma [...]
R.J. Lewis
février 10th, 2010 at 2 h 44 min
Nice analysis! Nice to see someone is tracking pharma’s activity. Perhaps you should set up an annual award for Best Twittering Pharma!
Evaluating Pharmaceutical Twitter Accounts | PRforPharma
février 22nd, 2010 at 22 h 51 min
[...] compare to so-called best practices for Twitter engagement. WhyDotPharma has already conducted a two part analytical look at the presence of pharmaceutical companies as it relates to their number of [...]